West Point Standard Misconduct HearingMarch 24, 2022
West Point Standard Misconduct Hearing.
A West Point Standard Misconduct Hearing, formerly known as an Informal Misconduct Hearing, is governed by USMA Regulation 1-10 (not available to the public). This regulation was recently updated on 23 February 2022.
A standard misconduct hearing is convened before a Cadet can receive certain punishment for the following suspected violations (including attempted violations):
- Drugs and Narcotics (as defined by AR 150-1, paragraph 6-8)
- Alcoholic Beverages (as defined by AR 150-1, paragraph 6-9)
- Conduct Unbecoming a Cadet of the Regular Army (as defined by AR 150-1, paragraph 6-11)
- Conspiracy among Cadets (as defined by AR 150-1, paragraph 6-12)
- Indebtedness (as defined by AR 150-1, paragraph 6-13)
- Criminal Conviction (as defined by AR 150-1, paragraph 6-14)
- Hazing (as defined by AR 150-1, paragraph 6-15)
- Other Misconduct Offenses (as defined by AR 150-1, paragraph 6-16)
- Lack of Qualification for Service (as defined by AR 150-1, paragraph 7-7)
- Alcohol or other Drug Abuse Rehabilitation Failure (as defined by AR 150-1, paragraph 7-10)
A standard misconduct hearing is conducted by a single Investigating Officer. Typically, this investigator is a Field Grade Officer (MAJ or above). Essentially, the investigating officer is charged with making findings of fact and making recommendations to the Superintendent on what should be done to the Cadet. Typically, no prosecutor is present during the hearing. Unfortunately, Cadets have to represent themselves at the hearing; however, a lawyer can assist during all phases of a West Point Standard Misconduct Hearing. For example, a lawyer can assist with witness questions, arguments, and general hearing preparation (i.e. what evidence to present, how testify).
The following sequence of events should be expected:
- Notification of allegations, Government evidence, and Government witnesses (pre-board)
- Defense Investigation, Motions, and Preparation (pre-board)
- Questioning of Investigating Officer to ensure impartiality
- Opening Statement
- Presentation of Government Witnesses and Evidence
- Presentation of Defense Witnesses and Evidence
- Closing Statement
- Investigating Officer Deliberations
- Investigating Officer Announcement of Findings and Recommendations
If the investigating officer makes an adverse finding, he/she will also make a recommendation on what action should be taken against the Cadet in question. The following recommendations can be made:
- Restriction to limits
- Deprivation of privileges
- Reduction in or withdrawal of cadet officer or non commissioned officer rank
- Punishment tours
- Fatigue tours
- Loss of leave
- Forfeiture of pay
- Delayed graduation (by less than a full year)
- Turn-back to the next lower class
- Suspension from the Military Academy
- Separation from USMA
- Invite select cadets pending separation to participate in the Academy Mentorship Program (AMP)
The investigating officer's findings and recommendations are routed through the Cadet's chain of command, and then to the Commandant. After the Commandant makes a recommendation, the entire packet is served back on the Cadet for review and rebuttal, if any. The Superintendent then makes a final recommendation and either closes the case, or forwards to the Secretary of the Army (for separation decisions). Of note, if there are adverse findings, the Superintendent is not bound by the investigating officer's recommendations.
A West Point Standard Misconduct Hearing is an informal hearing which can have serious consequences, such as separation and repayment of federal funds (recoupment). Unfortunately, any Cadet facing a standard misconduct hearing is forced to represent him/herself. As discussed above, a Cadet benefits if he/she retains a lawyer to help prepare and present their case. Cadets can retain Civilian Counsel to assist.
This Article was written by Attorney Matthew Barry, a 2008 West Point Graduate.