Result:  Retained

The accused, a West Point Cadet, faced separation from West Point due to medical treatment that she received.  The accused was placed on a leave of absence and not provided enough information on how to return. Attorney Barry initially assisted her with a Congressional Complaint, which resulted in West Point finally providing her guidance. Once she returned to West Point, she was told she was facing a medical separation.  Attorney Barry drafted her rebuttal, demonstrating she was never diagnosed with any condition that would prevent her commissioning. Despite resistance from the Medical Staff at West Point, the accused's separation was disapproved and she will be allowed to commission.

Result:  No Separation; No Turn Back

The accused, a West Point Cadet, faced an Honor Board for an alleged violation of the Honor Code relating to lying about being at a training event. Attorney Barry represented the accused from the onset of the investigation all the way through his Cadet Advisory Board.  Attorney Barry creating a trial plan for the accused, resulting in him being retained in his class.

Result:  Board overturned for legal error

The accused, an ROTC Scholarship Cadet, faced disenrollment based on a positive drug test for THC. Attorney Barry prepared the accused for his Board and was present during it.  Unfortunately, despite the amount of evidence collected by Attorney Barry demonstrating that the accused unknowingly ingested THC, the Board recommended that the accused by disenrolled.  Attorney Barry drafted an appeal of the Board findings, demonstrating that the improper standard was applied.  The Board was overturned for legal error.

Result:  Allegation unsubstantiated

The accused, a West Point Cadet, faced an Honor Board for an alleged violation of the Honor Code relating to a forgotten citation. Attorney Barry prepared the accused on a short timeline, collecting additional evidence and witnesses that the honor investigation failed to uncover.  Attorney Barry drafted the accused's trial plan and was on-call for him on the day of the board. Ultimately, despite the aggressive posture taken against him, the allegation was unsubstantiated by an Honor Investigative Hearing (HIH).

Result:  Allegation unsubstantiated; Retained as a Scholarship Cadet

The accused, an ROTC Cadet, faced disenrollment for an alleged sexual assault. Attorney Barry collected additional evidence, demonstrating that the alleged victim had a pattern of saying racist comments and that his report of sexual assault was likely motivated by his racial animus.  Attorney Barry also demonstrated that no party involved in the incident, except for the accused, was participating in the Disenrollment Board. Ultimately the Board agreed with the accused and unsubstantiated the allegation, despite its serious nature.

Result:  Retained as a Scholarship Cadet

The accused, an ROTC Cadet, faced disenrollment for a shoplifting incident that occurred at the end of advanced camp. Attorney Barry created the accused's trial plan and collected additional evidence and witnesses on his behalf.  Ultimately, due to the testimony of his three peers that were present during the incident and the accused's stellar record, he was retained as a Scholarship Cadet by an ROTC Disenrollment Board.

Result:  Allegations unsubstantiated

The accused, an ROTC Cadet, was under investigation for sexual assault. Attorney Barry got the investigating officer's questions via email and assisted the Cadet in responding and providing supporting evidence.  Based on the answers provided to the investigating officer, as well as the additional evidence provided by the accused, the allegations were unsubstantiated and the accused continued in the ROTC program.

Result:  Disenrollment Board Recommended that the Accused not pay back $90,000 and that he continue his Army service; Board Overturned on Appeal

The accused, an ROTC Cadet, faced disenrollment for Sexual Harassment during Advanced Camp. Attorney Barry represented the accused at his ROTC Disenrollment Board. Attorney Barry prepared the accused's Defense, resulting in a Board Recommendation that the Accused not pay back $90,000 in tuition money paid and that he be allowed to continue service in the Army as a Soldier.  Attorney Barry also successfully pointed out legal errors at the proceeding to the appellate authority, resulting in the recommendation for disenrollment being overturned.

Result:  60 Disciplinary Hours, 30 Suspended; 30 Days withdrawn privileges; No Separation

The accused, a West Point Cadet, faced a Brigade Article 10 Board for alleged Domestic Violence and Fraternization. Attorney Barry drafted the accused's matters for the second reading, highlighting the accused's repeated efforts to break off the relationship and the overwhelming proof that he was actually the victim of domestic violence. Ultimately, the accused received relatively minor punishment and was allowed to stay at the Academy.

Result:  Allegation unsubstantiated

The accused, an ROTC Cadet, was under investigation for online misconduct.  Attorney Barry advised the accused for the duration of the investigation, assisting her with her responses to the investigating officer. Ultimately, the online misconduct allegation was unsubstantiated and the accused did not face ROTC Disenrollment.

Result:  Allegation unsubstantiated

The accused, a West Point Cadet, was under investigation for inappropriate conduct with a fellow Cadet. Essentially, he was accused of harassing his ex-girlfriend. Attorney Barry advised the accused during his investigation, ultimately resulting in the allegations being unsubstantiated.

Result:  Allegations unsubstantiated

The accused, a West Point Cadet, faced an Honor Board for two alleged violations of the Honor Code. Attorney Barry investigated the case, created a trial plan, and was present during the Honor Board, advising the accused throughout.  The allegations were unsubstantiated.

Result:  Board and PMS Recommendation Overturned

The accused, an ROTC Cadet, was facing disenrollment for two alcohol related incidents. At the ROTC Disenrollment Board, the Investigating Officer made several legal errors.  Despite the Investigating Officer and PMS recommending that the accused be disenrolled, Attorney Barry was successful in getting the Board overturned based on legal errors.

Result:  Retained and Commissioned

The accused, an ROTC Cadet, was facing disenrollment for attempted bribery.  Attorney Barry prepared the accused for her proceeding by gathering additional evidence and preparing witness questions, argument, etc.  Attorney Barry was also present at the hearing to advise the accused. Ultimately, the Disenrollment Board recommended that the accused remain in the ROTC program and be commissioned. Despite this recommendation, the accused's PMS recommended that she be separated. Attorney Barry drafted the accused's appeal to the CG of Cadet Command, ultimately resulting in the accused being retained in ROTC and commissioned.

Result:  The Cadet Command Commanding General (CG) initially disenrolled the accused from the ROTC program. The accused appealed the CG’s decision, and the accused was ultimately reinstated and allowed to receive his appointment as a commissioned officer.

The accused, a cadet in the ROTC program, was disenrolled from the ROTC program by the Cadet Command CG following a positive urinalysis result for THC. Attorney Willard advised and assisted the accused throughout the appeal process, and Attorney Willard effectively gathered additional evidence and witness statements to support the accused with his appeal.  Attorney Willard also worked with the accused to submit a thorough and well-researched appeal regarding the accused’s disenrollment, and the Cadet Command CG ultimately reversed his own decision and reinstated the accused in the ROTC program.  Attorney Willard’s assistance and representation helped ensure the accused did not have to repay the cost his education, and the accused was permitted to receive his appointment as a commissioned officer in the United States Army.

Result:  Separation without a Call to Active Duty

The accused, an ROTC Cadet, faced disenrollment for multiple failures to report.  Attorney Barry effectively advocated for the accused's goal, which was to not be called to active duty.

Result: Allegation Unsubstantiated

The accused, a Cadet at West Point, faced a Standard Misconduct Hearing for allegedly tampering with a urine sample.  Attorney Barry assisted the accused in gathering evidence/witnesses, created a trial plan, and prepared the accused to represent herself (required for Standard Misconduct Hearings).  Ultimately, the investigating officer unsubstantiated the allegations and recommended that the UPL in charge of the drug test in question be reprimanded.

Result: Allegation Unsubstantiated

The accused, a Cadet at West Point, faced an honor investigation and then an honor board for leaving out a citation on a PL100 assignment.  Attorney Barry represented the accused throughout the entire process, which included preparing her to represent herself at the Honor Board.  After a contested proceeding, the allegation was unsubstantiated and the accused was allowed to continue at West Point.

Result: Allegation Unsubstantiated

The accused, a Cadet at West Point, faced an honor investigation and then an honor board for leaving out a citation on an Engineering Assignment.  Attorney Barry represented the accused throughout the entire process, which included preparing himself to represent him at the Honor Board.  After a contested proceeding, the allegation was unsubstantiated and the accused was allowed to continue to serve and graduate.

Result: Allegations unsubstantiated by Board; Disenrollment not Recommended

The accused's PMS initiated ROTC disenrollment for allegations of sexual assault, abusive sexual contact, and dating violence.  Attorney Barry prepared the Cadet for his hearing, gathered evidence, and attended the proceeding.  Ultimately, the allegations made by four different women were unsubstantiated by the Board. The Board recommended that the accused be commissioned.  The accused ultimately did not want to commission, due to personal desire to enlist and subsequently graduating from College. Likely due in part to the accused's wishes, he was disenrolled. Ultimately, the accused was allowed to enlist in another Service, likely due to the Board unsubstantiating the allegations.

Result: Allegations unsubstantiated; Cadet Retained

The accused, a Cadet at West Point, was forced to face an informal misconduct hearing for sexual misconduct, sexual harassment, and an Article 92 violation.  Attorney Barry prepared the accused for his hearing, including drafting questions, talking to witnesses, gathering evidence, and preparing argument.  Three of the four allegations were unsubstantiated. The remaining allegation, an Article 92 violation, only resulted in a verbal admonishment.  The accused graduated soon after, with his class.

Result: Rape allegation unsubstantiated; Board recommended Retention

The accused, a Cadet at West Point, was forced to face a misconduct board for alleged rape, conduct unbecoming, and underage drinking.  Attorney Barry spoke to witnesses that CID could/would not and gathered evidence that CID failed to, ultimately convincing the board that the alleged victim was not raped. The rape charge was unsubstantiated and the board recommended that the accused remain at West Point. Unfortunately, the Under Secretary of the Army separated the Cadet from West Point, but without forcing him to pay back any federal funds (recoupment).

Result: Minimal punishment issued; Graduated with Class

The accused, a Cadet at West Point, was under investigation for fostering a toxic command climate and making racist/sexist comments.  Attorney Barry assisted the accused in his response to his ultimate regimental level Article 10 Board.  He was issued minimal punishment, allowing him to graduate on time and Commission with the rest of his class.

Result: Allegations unsubstantiated

The accused, a Cadet at West Point, was forced to face an informal misconduct hearing for an alleged pattern of failing to treat women with dignity and respect and for a lack of personal discipline and military bearing.  Attorney Barry assisted the accused before and during the proceeding, ultimately resulting in all allegations being unsubstantiated.

Result: Allegation unsubstantiated

The accused, a Cadet at West Point, was accused of an Honor Violation.  Attorney Barry got involved early, assisting him with his response during the initial investigation.  The accused was cleared after his initial interview and he was allowed to graduate on time.